Re: [sv-ac] AC 196 - optional type spec?

From: Adam Krolnik <krolnik@lsil.com>
Date: Tue Nov 16 2004 - 09:56:38 PST

Hello Eduard;

As Brad Pierce wrote:

>The old portlist-style and the V2K prototype-style port declarations
>cannot be mixed in a module declaration. It's one or the other.

Sequences and properties should follow this restriction and allow only:
     no types on formal arguments
  or required types on all formal arguments.

This consistency will be helpful to the user trying to recall the possibilities.
Yes, I do understand that there is no specification for a sequence or property type.
Why not propose a way to do this?

     THanks.

     Adam Krolnik
     Verification Mgr.
     LSI Logic Corp.
     Plano TX. 75074
     Co-author "Assertion-Based Design"
Received on Tue Nov 16 09:56:53 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 16 2004 - 09:56:56 PST