Subject: RE: [sv-ac] Ballot for Remaining Extensions: 8, 10, 19
From: Armoni, Roy (roy.armoni@intel.com)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2004 - 12:05:27 PST
Hi Arif,
Intel's vote is as follows:
Extension 8 No
Extension 10 Yes
Extension 19 Yes
The reason for the "No" on extension 8 is that SVA have temporal flavor
that may conflict with the combinational intent of functions.
Regards,
Roy
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Arif
Samad
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:14 AM
To: sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Ballot for Remaining Extensions: 8, 10, 19
Since this is a company-based vote, only representatives of Accellera
member
corporations who meet attendance requirements are eligible to vote
(please
see details regarding voting rules on our web site).
According to our attendance records the following individuals are
eligible to vote:
Roy Armoni - Intel
John Havlicek - Motorola
Bassam Tabbara - Novas
Joseph Lu - Sun
Surrendra Dudani - Synopsys
In addition: Faisal Haque also meets the
attendance and corporate membership requirements
and can according to the rules governing committee
chairs.
Please place an (x) next to the proposals that you approve:
Extension 8 -------------
Extension 10 -------------
Extension 19 -------------
Please send your responses by 1/18/04.
According to our rules, if the e-mail vote on any extension is not
unanimous it will be discussed and voted on in committee on 1/19
where a simple majority is sufficient.
Regards,
Arif
------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Jan 19 2004 - 12:32:55 PST