[sv-ac] RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

From: Korchemny, Dmitry <dmitry.korchemny@intel.com>
Date: Thu Jun 28 2012 - 06:45:43 PDT

Hi Manisha,

Several minor comments:

* This task also provides capability to control the violation report creation from unique, unique0 and priority if and case constructs based on construct type (see 12.4.2 and 12.5.3).

Should be

This task also provides *the* capability to control the violation report creation from unique, unique0 and priority if and case constructs based on construct type (see 12.4.2 and 12.5.3).

* "expect" should be typeset as a keyword (bold courier new 9).

Thanks,
Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: Kulshrestha, Manisha [mailto:Manisha_Kulshrestha@mentor.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 08:12
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi,

I have uploaded a new version which includes case statements also. Please review.

Thanks.
Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: Korchemny, Dmitry [mailto:dmitry.korchemny@intel.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2012 11:04 PM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi Manisha,

This is fine with me.

Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 20:06
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi Dimitry,

I am thinking about combining same type of if and case together e.g. unique-if and unique-case will be controlled by the same option. Do you see any issues with that? Keeping them separate will add three more entries in the table. What do you think?

Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: Korchemny, Dmitry [mailto:dmitry.korchemny@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 6:00 PM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi Manisha,

I think unique and priority case should also be added.

Thanks,
Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 08:41
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi,

I have added a proposal for mantis 3474 for controlling violation reports using assertion control tasks. Please review and send me your comments.

Thanks.
Manisha

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Received on Thu Jun 28 06:46:42 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 28 2012 - 06:47:00 PDT