[sv-ac] 3525

Resend from Ed Cerny. Sorry this is out of order.

Shalom,

this is true about statements, but in the case of properties, these are not statements, they are in fact expressions. Since there is already this difference, wouldn't uniformity in properties be preferable?

Thanks
ed

From: Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 8:30 AM
To: Eduard Cerny
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: Email Ballot due June 25th

Ed,

Please note that not all statements in SV end in a semicolon. Look at the statement_item BNF. Some do, some don't. I think it would be preferable, if possible, to have property syntax consistent with that elsewhere in the language. For example, if case-endcase does not end in a semicolon in procedural code, then it should not need to in properties.

Regards,
Shalom

Shalom Bresticker
Intel LAD DA, Jerusalem, Israel
+972 2 589 6582 (office)
+972 54 721 1033 (cell)
http://www.linkedin.com/in/shalombresticker

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Received on Tue Jun 26 00:16:12 2012