[sv-ac] RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi Manisha,

This is fine with me.

Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 20:06
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi Dimitry,

I am thinking about combining same type of if and case together e.g. unique-if and unique-case will be controlled by the same option. Do you see any issues with that? Keeping them separate will add three more entries in the table. What do you think?

Manisha

-----Original Message-----
From: Korchemny, Dmitry [mailto:dmitry.korchemny@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 6:00 PM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi Manisha,

I think unique and priority case should also be added.

Thanks,
Dmitry

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 08:41
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] mantis 3474: proposal added

Hi,

I have added a proposal for mantis 3474 for controlling violation reports using assertion control tasks. Please review and send me your comments.

Thanks.
Manisha

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Received on Sat Jun 23 10:33:51 2012