Re: {Disarmed} Re: [sv-champions] RE: [sv-ac] Errata in section 17, checker

Mantis 4154 will not be part of the Ballot Review Committee meetings.
As both Dave and Stu have already mentioned, mantis 4154 will need
to wait for a future PAR. The Ballot Review Committee will only
be addressing comments that were submitted by voting entities during
the period of time when the LRM was being balloted. This set of ballot
comments is a fixed set of comments that were sent to us by the IEEE.

All non-editorial issues that are raised at this point in the process
will need to wait for a future PAR. This is the IEEE policy. Stu
has already commented that mantis 4154 contains non-editorial
changes.

Neil

On 05/11/12 11:36, Ben Cohen wrote:
> Stuart,
> I updated http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=4154 and that is a
> child of
> http://www.eda-stds.org/svdb/view.php?id=3232
> The update was because bus size needs corrections in 2 places, the
> checker declaration and the checker instantiation.
>
> There is a P1800-2012 Ballot Resolution Technical Committee (TC) on May
> 21^st , and my mantis will be addressed there.
> Ben
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Stuart Sutherland
> <stuart@sutherland-hdl.com <mailto:stuart@sutherland-hdl.com>> wrote:
>
> Ben,____
>
> __ __
>
> My definition of editorial correction is a little more strict:
> Editorial corrections are primarily limited to fixing font,
> spelling, and punctuation errors, and simple grammatical
> corrections. Changes to wording, or adding/deleting text are beyond
> simple editorial fixes.____
>
> __ __
>
> Of the corrections you have requested, I would classify changing
> always to always_ff and adding the vector size to "bus" as
> editorial, and will make those correction in the re-ballot draft.
> The remaining requested changes, no matter how obvious, will need to
> be filed as a Mantis item for committee consideration in a future
> version of the standard.____
>
> __ __
>
> Stu
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Stuart Sutherland____
>
> Sutherland HDL, Inc.____
>
> *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from
> "stuart@sutherland-hdl.com" claiming to be* *MailScanner has
> detected a possible fraud attempt from "stuart@sutherland-hdl.com"
> claiming to be* stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
> <http://stuart@sutherland-hdl.com>____
>
> 503-692-0898 <tel:503-692-0898>
> www.sutherland-hdl.com <http://www.sutherland-hdl.com> ____
>
> __ __
>
> *From:*owner-sv-champions@eda.org
> <mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org>
> [mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org
> <mailto:owner-sv-champions@eda.org>] *On Behalf Of *Rich, Dave
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:24 PM
> *To:* hdlcohen@gmail.com <mailto:hdlcohen@gmail.com>
>
>
> *Cc:* sv-ac@eda-stds.org <mailto:sv-ac@eda-stds.org>; Korchemny,
> Dmitry; stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
> <mailto:stuart@sutherland-hdl.com>; Bresticker, Shalom;
> sv-xc@eda.org <mailto:sv-xc@eda.org>
> *Subject:* [sv-champions] RE: [sv-ac] Errata in section 17, checker____
>
> __ __
>
> Ben,____
>
> __ __
>
> I am about to send out an e-mail describing how the IEEE ballot
> review process works. Regardless of how trivial, we are only allowed
> to vote on comments made during the ballot process, which is now
> closed. The only way to get a change like this in the ballot process
> is if this text touches one of the existing comments, or you can
> convince the editor that is only an editorial change.____
>
> __ __
>
> Dave ____
>
> Mentor Graphics*____*
>
> __ __

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.