RE: [sv-ac] question regarding assertion control tasks

From: Bresticker, Shalom <shalom.bresticker@intel.com>
Date: Sun Mar 25 2012 - 03:20:25 PDT

Hi, Ed.

I tested this in two major simulators and got different results.

One treated it as though the name of the top level module(s) had been specified.

The second treated it as though the name of the current module, the module where the $dumpvars task call appeared, was specified.

Regards,
Shalom

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> Eduard Cerny
> Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 8:30 PM
> To: Neil Korpusik; Eduard Cerny
> Cc: 'sv-ac@eda-stds.org'
> Subject: RE: [sv-ac] question regarding assertion control tasks
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> that applies when no arguments are given, but here you have level
> given.
> $dumpvars(3), there is no list of instances. I think that the LRM
> should be more specific in that case.
>
> Best regards
> ed

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Sun Mar 25 03:24:35 2012

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 25 2012 - 03:25:19 PDT