Hi,
This text was added in Mantis 1667 and implemented in Draft 6 of P1800-2009.
In part 1 of that proposal, the added text was
unless the formal argument is a local variable argument (see 16.7.2, 16.12.2).
where 16.12.2 was a new subclause added by that proposal, the sub-clause titled
"Local variable formal arguments in property declarations".
That sub-clause is not numbered 16.12.19.
Apparently that is what the reference should be.
Regards,
Shalom
From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Korchemny, Dmitry
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2012 2:35 PM
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] Strange reference to Implication subclause
Hi all,
Subclause 16.8.1 Typed formal arguments in sequence declarations, P.359, lines 17-20, reads:
A reference to a typed formal argument within a sequence_match_item (see 16.10) shall not stand as the variable_lvalue in either an operator_assignment or an inc_or_dec_expression unless the formal argument is a local variable argument (see 16.8.2, 16.12.6).
The reference 16.12.6 points to the subclause describing the property implication, and it is not clear to me in this context. Note that this reference is not new, and has already existed in LRM2009.
Does anybody have a good explanation?
Thanks,
Dmitry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Israel (74) Limited This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Sun Jan 22 04:57:04 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 22 2012 - 04:57:09 PST