Though it is confusing, changing it in section 16 would make is misaligned
with section *15.5.3 Persistent trigger: triggered property, *and we don't
want to (or most likely can't) change that one.
Ben
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Dana Fisman Ofek
<Dana.Fisman@synopsys.com>wrote:
> I agree with Ed – it is confusing. Event method seems more appropriate.***
> *
>
> ** **
>
> Dana****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduard
> Cerny
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:53 AM
> *To:* Bresticker, Shalom; Eduard Cerny; Korchemny, Dmitry;
> sv-ac@eda-stds.org
>
> *Subject:* [sv-ac] RE: Sampled value of triggered and matched****
>
> ** **
>
> I realize that, but perhaps that should be changed to be aligned. it is a
> little confusing, the difference, no?****
>
> ed****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Bresticker, Shalom [mailto:shalom.bresticker@intel.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2012 10:47 AM
> *To:* Eduard Cerny; Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> *Subject:* RE: Sampled value of triggered and matched****
>
> ** **
>
> 15.5.3 describes event.triggered as a property.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] *On Behalf Of *Eduard
> Cerny
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2012 5:12 PM
> *To:* Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> *Subject:* [sv-ac] RE: Sampled value of triggered and matched****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Dmitry,****
>
> ** **
>
> perhaps a better solution would be to call e.triggered an event method
> rather than event property. ****
>
> ** **
>
> best regards****
>
> ed****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] *On Behalf Of *Korchemny,
> Dmitry
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:32 AM
> *To:* sv-ac@eda-stds.org
> *Subject:* [sv-ac] Sampled value of triggered and matched****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi all,****
>
> ** **
>
> In 16.5.1 (Page 346, bottom) it is written:****
>
> “The sampled value of the triggered event property and the sequence
> methods triggered and****
>
> matched (see 16.13.6) is defined as the current value returned by the
> method.”****
>
> ** **
>
> Would it be better to rephrase it as****
>
> ** **
>
> “The sampled value of the triggered event property and the sequence
> methods triggered and****
>
> matched (see 16.13.6) is defined as the current value returned by the
> method (or property).”****
>
> ** **
>
> Any better suggestions?****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks,****
>
> Dmitry****
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. ****
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. ****
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.****
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean. ****
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jan 10 08:03:58 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 10 2012 - 08:04:03 PST