[sv-ac] RE: Call to vote: Due August 15

From: Little Scott-B11206 <B11206@freescale.com>
Date: Mon Aug 15 2011 - 08:25:52 PDT

Mantis 3033 __X__ Yes ____ No
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3033
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=5279&type=bug

This is implemented on top of 3213. The text stating this should be added in a more conspicuous place or colored in some way to draw additional attention to that statement.

In 17.9 there is some new text in the code example that is in black and should be in blue I believe.

I think that the first sentence of C.2.7 would be more clear if reworded as:
The always procedure is allowed in checkers by IEEE Std 1800-2009 in checkers, but always_comb, always_latch, and always_ff were forbidden.

Mantis 2328 __X__ Yes ____ No
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2328
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=5274&type=bug

Mantis 3295 ____ Yes __X__ No
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3295<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2328>
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=5277&type=bug

Have Shalom's comments/questions in the Notes section been addressed?

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Aug 15 08:26:19 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 15 2011 - 08:26:24 PDT