RE: [sv-ac] Editorial change on "resp."

Clearly, "respectively" was meant.

Shalom

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Stuart Sutherland
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:38 PM
To: sv-ac@eda-stds.org; neil.korpusik@oracle.com
Subject: [sv-ac] Editorial change on "resp."

Dmitry and Neil,

Clause 20.13 uses the abbreviation "resp." twice. This abbreviation is not used anywhere else in the LRM, and is not defined. I just did a google search, and it is not a standard abbreviation in the English language (it is in Dutch, Danish and Swedish). Various definitions I found on web pages suggest "resp." stands for "response" or "responsibility". The Dutch, Danish and Swedish abbreviation translates to "respectively".

Can I have approval to make an editorial change and spell out "resp."? If so, what should I change it to? From the context, I am guessing it means either "respectively" or "respective to", but I am not sure what the AC committee intended when they used the non-standard abbreviation.

Stu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Stuart Sutherland
Sutherland HDL, Inc.
stuart@sutherland-hdl.com
503-692-0898
www.sutherland-hdl.com<http://www.sutherland-hdl.com>

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.