Re: [sv-ac] Call to vote: Due August 8

From: ben cohen <hdlcohen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon Aug 08 2011 - 22:57:12 PDT

Mantis 2578 __x__ Yes ____ No
Mantis 3033 __x__ Yes ____ No
Ben
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Thomas J Thatcher <
thomas.thatcher@oracle.com> wrote:

> My Votes:
>
> On 08/03/11 09:56, Korchemny, Dmitry wrote:
>
> Mantis 2578 __x__ Yes ____ No
>>
>>
>> http://www.eda-stds.org/**mantis/view.php?id=2578<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=2578>
>>
>> http://www.eda-stds.org/**mantis/file_download.php?file_**
>> id=5251&type=bug<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=5251&type=bug><
>> http://www.eda-stds.org/**mantis/file_download.php?file_**
>> id=5251&type=bug<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=5251&type=bug>
>> >
>>
>>
>> Mantis 3033 __x__ Yes ____ No
>>
>>
>> http://www.eda-stds.org/**mantis/view.php?id=3033<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3033>
>>
>> http://www.eda-stds.org/**mantis/file_download.php?file_**
>> id=5257&type=bug<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=5257&type=bug><
>> http://www.eda-stds.org/**mantis/file_download.php?file_**
>> id=5257&type=bug<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=5257&type=bug>
>> >
>>
>
> Friendly amendments:
>
> 17.3 Checker instantiation
> Include the entire paragraph in the change. It's much easier to find the
> context that way.
>
> Was there a reason for adding the restriction on instantiating a checker
> containing procedural code?
>
>
> 17.3.1
> Change:
> For instance check_outside,
> To
> For checker instance check_outside,
>
> In reading the proposal, I kept interpreting this as "for example"
>
> Additional Comment:
> I think we did determine that a sequence triggered() method would be legal
> in an always_ff:
>
> always_ff @(sequence.triggered()) begin
> cg.sample()
> end
>
> But it still feels more natural to write it as an always block rather than
> an always_ff.
>
> Tom
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Mon Aug 8 23:03:53 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Aug 08 2011 - 23:03:57 PDT