Hi Dmitry,
Below is what I had in my previous email. This is the process
we should follow. We don't create new mantis items for this,
we make updates to the existing mantis items.
------
All of the mantis items that currently have their status set to
Completed will need to be reviewed for accuracy. The following process
should be used.
1. When a problem is found with the updates made by the editor
-- The mantis status should be set to Editor.
-- A note should be added to the mantis item which explains the problem.
2. When the changes made by the editor are correct
-- The mantis status should be set to Closed.
-- A note should be added mentioning that the updates were made correctly.
Neil
On 05/11/11 12:37, Korchemny, Dmitry wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
>
>
> Is the committee authorized to open a new editorial issue and to set it
> to Editor status instead of Resolved? Otherwise, the new editorial
> issues won’t be fixed in this draft.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dmitry
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Wed May 11 12:47:13 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed May 11 2011 - 12:47:17 PDT