[sv-ac] RE: Call to vote: Due May 2

Mantis 3213 ____ Yes __X__ No

http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=3213

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4961&type=bug

I thought the idea was to fix the definition of $sampled by adjusting it where it is wrong and defining it for all variable types. I am not wild about that idea, but I can see how it is not an awful solution. If this is the idea why do we need to define concurrent?

I find the current proposal where concurrent and sampled are defined then $sampled returns the concurrent value confusing.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.