[sv-ac] RE: Call to vote: Due May 2

From: Prabhakar, Anupam <anupam_prabhakar@mentor.com>
Date: Fri Apr 29 2011 - 12:02:08 PDT

Mantis 3213 ____ Yes __X__ No

http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=3213

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4961&type=bug

This proposal has become very confusing. There is a concept of a 'sampled value' and then a concept of a 'concurrent value' and then $sampled() which would return a concurrent value instead of a sampled value. I do not see any reason why 'sampled value' should be replaced with 'concurrent value' in the LRM.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Fri Apr 29 12:02:49 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 29 2011 - 12:03:03 PDT