My votes are below.
Mantis 3213 __X_ Yes ____ No
http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=3213
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4939&type=bug
[Seligman, Erik] Friendly amendment: in 16.9.3, "Evaluating expression in the concurrent context is explained in 16.5.2.", 'expression' ==> 'expressions'.
Mantis 3295 ___ Yes __ X__ No
http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=3295
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4933&type=bug
[Seligman, Erik] Getting closer, but I think it still needs too many small edits to approve at this time.
- The list of arguments at the bottom of the first paragraph of new text on p.3 should be a bulleted list.
¾ control_type...
¾ assertion_type...
etc.
- Same paragraph: "This system task provides capability" ==> "This system task provides the capability", "The $assertcontrol" ==> "$assertcontrol"
- P.4- PassOff bullet: "while the execution of pass action" ==> "while the execution of the pass action"
- Last paragraph on p.4 needs some rewriting.
o "If assertion_type is not specified, then it defaults to 15 i.e. the system task applies to all types of assertion statements and expect statements."==> "If assertion_type is not specified, then it defaults to 15 (Concurrent|Simple_Immediate|Deferred_Immediate|Expect) and the system task applies to all types of assertion statements and expect statements."
o "Similarly, if directive_type is not specified, then it defaults to 7 i.e. the system task applies to all types of directives" ==> "Similarly, if directive_type is not specified, then it defaults to 7 (Assert|Cover|Assume) and the system task applies to all types of directives
o I think the concept of constructing arguments using ORing needs to be described before the concept is used in the above sentences.
o We should also avoid the mid-sentence run-on i.e.s and e.g.s.
- I think each argument should have its own (possibly short) paragraph for clarity, rather than trying to pack them all into the large one at the bottom of p.4.
- In the example on p.5, I think we should say SIMPLE_IMMEDIATE and DEFERRED_IMMEDIATE instead of S_IMMEDIATE and D_IMMEDIATE. If we really need to save characters, we can put a comment next to the symbols stating their full meaning: let S_IMMEDIATE = 2; /* Simple Immediate */
Mantis 3491 ____ Yes ____ No __X__ Abstain
http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=3491
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4925&type=bug
[Seligman, Erik] I don't understand the formal semantics well enough to figure out if this is ultimately the desired expression, so I'll have to trust you guys!
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Apr 21 13:02:17 2011
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 21 2011 - 13:02:27 PDT