RE: [sv-ac] RE: Updating proposals (reminder)

Hi,
 
I have uploaded another version to include changes suggested by Scott.
 
Manisha

________________________________

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 9:32 AM
To: Little Scott-B11206; Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] RE: Updating proposals (reminder)

Hi,
 
This has always been like this. Probably order was decided based on
usage (more used things defined first) ?? Anyway, I'll change the order
and make it same as in the table (assuming no one has objection).
 
Thanks.
Manisha

________________________________

From: Little Scott-B11206 [mailto:B11206@freescale.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 5:47 PM
To: Kulshrestha, Manisha; Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: Updating proposals (reminder)

Hi Manisha:

I think it looks better. I have one question though. Is there a reason
that the control_type directives aren't described in the order they are
found in the table?

It seems a bit silly, but I find it hard to read. When looking for a
description of the last item in the table I expect to be able to go to
the last item in the list, but item 11 is described 4 items from the end
of the list.

Thanks,

Scott

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of
Kulshrestha, Manisha
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 1:32 AM
To: Korchemny, Dmitry
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] RE: Updating proposals (reminder)

Hi Dimitry,

I have uploaded new proposal based on feedbacks.

Thanks.

Manisha

________________________________

From: Korchemny, Dmitry [mailto:dmitry.korchemny@intel.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2011 6:48 PM
To: Katz, Jacob; Kulshrestha, Manisha; Tapan Kapoor
Cc: sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: Updating proposals (reminder)

Hi Manisha, Jacob, Tapan,

Please, notify me when your proposals are ready for vote:

* 3295: need a way to control only asserts/covers/assume
directives

* 3069: Relax rules for $global_clock resolution

* 3491: Incorrect local variable flow rule in F.5.4

Thanks,

Dmitry

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/> , and is
believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.