[sv-ac] RE: Call to vote: Due March 28 (reminder)

From: Little Scott-B11206 <B11206@freescale.com>
Date: Tue Mar 29 2011 - 04:50:27 PDT

Hi Jacob:

I agree that they are there for different reasons. That doesn't change the fact that it looks very awkward. I would suggest adding an explanation for 16.14.5 or removing the explanation for 16.14.6.

Thanks,
Scott

From: Katz, Jacob [mailto:jacob.katz@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 4:11 AM
To: Little Scott-B11206; Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: Call to vote: Due March 28 (reminder)

I think these refer to different things for different reasons, I decided to leave them as is.

--------------------------------
Jacob M. Katz | jacob.katz@intel.com<mailto:jacob.katz@intel.com> | Work: +972-4-865-5726 | iNet: (8)-465-5726

From: Little Scott-B11206 [mailto:B11206@freescale.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 23:01
To: Katz, Jacob; Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: Call to vote: Due March 28 (reminder)

Thanks Jacob. I still find it odd that the changes to 16.9.11 end as follows, but I won't complain too loudly if others find it to be okay.

See 16.14.5.

See 16.14.6 for a definition of sequence methods.

Mantis 3191 _X___ Yes ____ No

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3191
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4855&type=bug

Thanks,
Scott

From: Katz, Jacob [mailto:jacob.katz@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 2:43 PM
To: Little Scott-B11206; Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: RE: Call to vote: Due March 28 (reminder)

I uploaded an update with the articles and the fixed formatting of the example in 16.14.6.

--------------------------------
Jacob M. Katz | jacob.katz@intel.com<mailto:jacob.katz@intel.com> | Work: +972-4-865-5726 | iNet: (8)-465-5726

From: owner-sv-ac@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ac@eda.org] On Behalf Of Little Scott-B11206
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 17:19
To: Korchemny, Dmitry; sv-ac@eda-stds.org
Subject: [sv-ac] RE: Call to vote: Due March 28 (reminder)

Mantis 2476 _X___ Yes ____ No
http://www.verilog.org/mantis/view.php?id=2476
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4856&type=bug

Mantis 3191 ____ Yes __X__ No

http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3191
http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/file_download.php?file_id=4855&type=bug

In all of your "See ... for detailed definition of ... . You should have an article (e.g., a, the) prior to detailed. For instance, "See ... for a detailed definition ... ." Another idea would be to follow the style seen in many other places in the LRM and use the more terse (see 16.9.11) where appropriate. In fact, if you look at the end of the changes to 16.9.11 you see an example of where the two styles collide. There is a "See 16.14.5" immediately prior to your verbose "See" statement. Please merge these.

In the changes to 16.14.6, e2_with_arg should be formatted on a single line like e2.

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
believed to be clean.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Tue Mar 29 04:51:36 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 29 2011 - 04:51:43 PDT