RE: [sv-ac] RE: [sv-bc] Minor changes for final LRM


Subject: RE: [sv-ac] RE: [sv-bc] Minor changes for final LRM
From: Jay Lawrence (lawrence@cadence.com)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 04:35:08 PDT


This is more a question of process than content Stephen.
 
The semantic appendix is without a doubt the most precise and
self-consistent part of the entire LRM.
 
The way all the committees I have voting rights in have worked is that
these things were debated and then there is a vote to include the
content, section-by-section, paragraph-by-paragraph. Not a process
where-by if noone objects the content goes in.
Jay

===================================
Jay Lawrence
Senior Architect
Functional Verification
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(978) 262-6294
lawrence@cadence.com
===================================

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Meier [mailto:Stephen.Meier@synopsys.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 11:30 PM
To: Jay Lawrence; David W. Smith; sv-ac@eda.org
Subject: Re: [sv-ac] RE: [sv-bc] Minor changes for final LRM

Jay, David et al:

The semantics document has been under review for a considerable time
period. SV-AC members were invited to review and give their feedback
and as far as I know no feedback was given aside from the original
semantics team.

Earlier SV-AC meetings clearly stated that the document would be brought
into the LRM as an appendix and there was no objection to that plan.

The semantics were completed by renowned industry experts and it is
provided for completeness and support of the LRM so there is no change,
but a clear semantics definition.

-Steve
----------
At 08:00 PM 5/13/2003 -0400, Jay Lawrence wrote:

David,
 
I have reviewed the LRM changes here and have 1 question (which may
become an objection) and 1 definite objection.
 
First the question, did the sv-ac review and approve the addition of
this appendix G as part of change LRM-356?
 
I'm aware that they had been discussing John's definition here, but it
is a major addition to the LRM that I saw no vote on it for inclusion,
there has certainly been no debate on the reflector for the last 2 weeks
(unless I've been removed from sv-ac). Erich Marschner is our usual
sv-ac representative but he is traveling in Japan and somewhat out of
reach. Unless there was a specific vote to include this major addition,
I would ask that it be removed.
 
Secondly, I object to the change of functionality in LRM-359. The
addition of the clause "Within a scope, initial values are applied in
the order of declaration". Is not a clarification, it adds a new
requirement on implementation and is not complete. Initial values are
allowed to contain hierarchical names, therefore specifying the ordering
within a scope is not sufficient. A complete ordering of elaboration and
assignment of initial values across all scopes (including parameters,
localparams and defparams) would need to be done to make this
initialization deterministic. This addition is a hack that adds no
determinism.

Jay

===================================
Jay Lawrence
Senior Architect
Functional Verification
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
(978) 262-6294
lawrence@cadence.com
===================================

-----Original Message-----

From: David W. Smith [mailto:david.smith@synopsys.com]

Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 7:33 PM

To: sv-ac@eda.org; sv-bc@eda.org; 'sv-cc'; sv-ec@eda.org

Subject: [sv-bc] Minor changes for final LRM

Greetings,

I requested from the chairs and SV champions any changes they felt were
required to the Draft 6 LRM before it is released. These changes are
meant to be corrections to what was provided or correct missing items.

I have just posted to the SV-EC web site
(http://www.eda-twiki.org/sv-ec/Draft_6_Review/LRM_Issues.html) the current
set of changes. These changes (and any others that are deemed by the
Chairs to be appropriate) will be added to the final draft of the LRM.

Regards

David

David W. Smith

Synopsys Scientist

Synopsys, Inc.

Synopsys Technology Park

2025 NW Cornelius Pass Road

Hillsboro, OR 97124

Voice: 503.547.6467

Main: 503.547.6000

FAX: 503.547.6906

Email: david.smith@synopsys.com

http://www.synopsys.com <http://www.synopsys.com/>

 

Steve Meier (stephen.meier@synopsys.com) W: 650-584-4476, Cell:
408-393-8246



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed May 14 2003 - 04:35:58 PDT