Subject: Re: [sv-ac] Expressing a concern
From: John Havlicek (john.havlicek@motorola.com)
Date: Mon Feb 10 2003 - 21:25:04 PST
All:
What is the plan to achieve alignment with PSL?
The DWG was supposed to produce a unified kernel for
both the SV-AC and FVTC efforts, so the syntax and
semantics choices in the SVA LRM must be consistent
with such a plan. It is not reassuring to hear only
that alginment will be "worked out later".
Best regards,
John Havlicek
> From: "Faisal Haque"<fhaque@cisco.com>
> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 20:11:21 -0800
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
> Sender: owner-sv-ac@eda.org
> Precedence: bulk
>
> Prakash,
>
> You bring up a very good point about the scope of activities for this review
> process. It looks like we need to make a distinction between identifying
> technical problems in the language and changing the language.
>
> -Faisal
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Prakash Narain" <prakash@realintent.com>
> To: "sv-ac" <sv-ac@eda.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 6:06 PM
> Subject: [sv-ac] Expressing a concern
>
>
> > I am expressing a concern that if we start debating major syntax
> > revisions to the current proposal, we will not make much progress
> > in the given time. I will feel more comfortable if we only focus on
> > aspects of the proposal that clearly need revision to enhance the
> > stability of the DWG proposal.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Prakash
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Feb 10 2003 - 21:26:10 PST