Subject: [sv-ac] Voting clarification
From: Faisal Haque (fhaque@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Sep 26 2002 - 08:57:00 PDT
Folks,
Some questions were raised about the voting prcoess so here are a few
clarifications:
1) Requirements: David Lacey requested that this be classified as a minor
vote because with the major votes most of the users are left out of the
process. We have reviewed the minutes of the previous meetings but were
unable to identify a specific person requesting that requirements be treated
as a major item.
So unless anyone objects I would like to have the requirements vote be a
simple majority vote of all the participants who meet the attendance
requirements. If you would like it to be a major vote please make the
request at the meeting.
2) OVA donation vote:
a) This vote is to accept OVA as a resource for developing the assertion
subset for SV3.1. Allowing us to build consensus and create a unified
platform for the users.
As the chair I have decided that this vote is a critical issue and should be
voted on as a major vote. This vote needs to be done within the TCC criteria
for donation acceptance which are:
1- Must be compatible with SystemVerilog
2- Must be supported by a commercially available tool
3- If any part of the donation is viewed as acceptable, then the donation
should be accepted.
-Faisal
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Sep 26 2002 - 08:57:43 PDT