Date: Wed Jul 02 2014 - 08:25:21 PDT
Hi Yuri, You are of course correct - I'll raise a Mantis issue for it. We need to update that section in light of issue 4125 "Additional TLM2 interface constructs should be added to standard". Cheers, Darren From: owner-ieee1647@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org] On Behalf Of Yuri Tsoglin Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 4:21 PM To: ieee1647@eda.org Subject: mentioning "Specman" in LRM Hi, I've noticed a couple of places in the current LRM text, where Specman is mentioned. Specifically, the term "Specman tick": 9.13.4.2 Supported unidirectional TLM interfaces 9.13.4.3 Supported bidirectional TLM interfaces right at the beginning of each of these two sections. That should certainly be corrected. I guess the standard term for that is just "tick", but I am not sure. Regards, Yuri. [http://www.cadence.com/mail/footer_logocdns2.jpg] Yuri Tsoglin | e Language team, Specman RnD P: 972.3.9004305 M: 972.54.6468177 F: 972.3.9004001 www.cadence.com<http://www.cadence.com> -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner<http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
