Re: Working groups for the upcoming standard

Darren,
  As per IEEE policy, can I share this list with general public and see if
others are interested to contribute as well? Say via separate
emails/blogs/forums etc.

Thanks
Srini



On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Yuri Tsoglin <yurit@cadence.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Maybe the last one should also be separated into two? The first two issues
> there are related to generation constructs/semantics, and the third is
> related to TLM, which are two unrelated topics.
>
> Thanks,
> Yuri.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ieee1647@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org] On Behalf Of
> darren.galpin@infineon.com
> Sent: Friday, 01 November, 2013 17:43
> To: ieee1647@eda.org
> Subject: Working groups for the upcoming standard
>
> Hi,
>
> Here are the open mantis issues we have so far:
>
> 0004746<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4746>        Revise
> the chapter on Template types
> 0004745<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4745>
>  Reflection API enhancements
> 0004490<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4490>        ability
> to stop/restart evaluation of temporal checks (expects)
> 0004377<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4377>        new
> message configuration infrastructure
> 0004336<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4336>
>  read_only() missing from LRM
> 0004318<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4318>        Chapter
> 10 - Clarify variable clustering and ordering semantics for constraints
> 0004312<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4312>        Chapter
> 25 - Generalize messaging constructs to eneble structured messages
> 0004311<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4311>        Section
> 13.1 - Generalized on-event
> 0004125<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4125>
>  additional TLM2 interface constructs should be added to standard
> 0004124<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4124>        new set
> type should be added to standard
> 0004112<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=4112>        consume
> defined as a keyword but not defined anywhere else in LRM
> 0003386<http://www.eda-stds.org/mantis/view.php?id=3386>        Consider
> adding wildcard equality operators
>
>
> There are two working groups which seem to naturally fall out of this:
>
> 1)      Temporal Working Group
>       This would cover 0004490, 0004311, 0004112.
>
> 2)      Messaging Working Group
>       This would cover 0004377, 004312.
>
> Perhaps a third would be:
>
>         Types and Operators Working Group
>         This would cover 0004846, 0004124, 0003886
>
> And a fourth to mop up:
>
>         General Working Group
>         Covering 0004336, 0004318, 0004125
>
>
> So, do people agree with this, does it seem reasonable?
>
> We'd then of course need working group leaders and people to help out in
> each group..... Also, since the last meeting Hannes has organised the legal
> letter to cover the release of Cadence documentation for us to work on, and
> this has now been lodged with the IEEE. Many thanks Hannes!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Darren
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Darren Galpin                                         Tel: +44 117 9528741
> Infineon Technologies                        Fax: +44 117 9528777
> Infineon House                    Darren.Galpin@infineon.com<mailto:
> Darren.Galpin@infineon.com>
> Great Western Court
> Hunts Ground Road
> Stoke Gifford
> Bristol, BS34 8HP, England
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
> MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
>
>

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.