Re: November 12th IEEE1947 meeting

I've moved the conference call to the new tentative date (passcode: 304624).

Best,
-- yaron

On Nov 8, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Andrew Piziali <andy@piziali.dv.org> wrote:

> Darren wrote:
> 
>> OK, given the DASC timetable for the IEEE1647 PAR vote (goes live next
>> week, voting for one week), I'm proposing 3rd December for the
>> meeting.  OK with everyone?
> 
> Good here!
> 
> Thanks Darren.
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Brett Lammers [mailto:brettl@cadence.com] 
>> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 4:27 PM
>> To: Joseph Hupcey III; Galpin Darren (IFGB ATV MCD SIP CV)
>> Subject: RE: November 12th IEEE1947 meeting
> 
>> I agree delaying it makes sense to me
> 
>> Brett Lammers   |   Solutions Architect, Systems Solutions Group
> 
>> P: 303.579.6721  www.cadence.com
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-ieee1647@eda.org [mailto:owner-ieee1647@eda.org] On Behalf Of Joseph Hupcey III
>> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:44 AM
>> To: darren.galpin@infineon.com; ieee1647@eda.org
>> Subject: RE: November 12th IEEE1947 meeting
> 
>> Hi Darren, et.al.,
> 
>> It's probably best to simply postpone it, especially since we're
>> waiting on the DASC.
> 
>> Note that the week of November 19 is a holiday week here in the US
>> (Thanksgiving is on that Thursday, and a lot of people travel).
>> Hence, I'd recommend Monday November 26 or later.
> 
>> Joe
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-ieee1647@eda.org On Behalf Of darren.galpin@infineon.com
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 3:41 AM
>>> To: ieee1647@eda.org
>>> Subject: November 12th IEEE1947 meeting
> 
>>> Hi,
> 
>>> I will be unable to attend the proposed meeting on the 12th November.
>>> If people so wish we can still go ahead (Mike - could you run it in
>>> my absence), or we could postpone it. Note that since last time we
>>> have voted to approve the PAR and it now awaits DASC approval.
> 
>>> Cheers,
> 
>>> Darren
> 
> 
> -- 
> 	Andrew Piziali, <andy@piziali.dv.org>, +1-214-455-8577
> 	Skype andrew_piziali
> 
> "... unioning allows administrators to keep [related] files separate
> physically, but to merge them logically into a single view." -- Charles
> P. Wright and Erez Zadok describe an aspect-oriented filesystem in
> "Unionfs: Bringing Filesystems Together" in "Linux Journal," 12/04
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.