Darren, you wrote: > Following on from yesterdays telecon, here is a list of carry-over > topics from the last standardisation process which we might want to > address in this standard. Please can people take a look and comment to > the reflector in anticipation of a further discussion on what we do > with them in a future telecon ... > Issue 2763 - semicolons as separators > The LRM always refers to semicolons as separators. It never > specifically allows a semicolon following the last language element, > as is found in much existing e code. This should probably be addressed from the standpoint of null e language elements. For example, a null action is a valid element of a method and is introduced by a pair of semicolons or a semicolon preceding the brace that closes a method body. -- Andrew Piziali, <andy@piziali.dv.org>, +1-214-455-8577 -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Jul 14 09:59:13 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 14 2009 - 09:59:20 PDT