Date: 2016-09-21
Time: 16.00:00 UTC (9:00 PDT)
Duration: 1 hour
Agenda
Attendance Record
Legend:
x = attended
- = missed
r = represented
. = not yet a member
v = valid voter (2 out of last 3 or 3/4 overall)
n = not a valid voter
t = chair eligible to vote only to make or break a tie
Attendance re-initialized on 2016-03-09:
v[.x-xxxxx---xx] Mehbub Ali (Intel)
n[.xx--x------x] Ang Boon Chong (Intel)
n[x-x-xx-x-x--x] Shalom Bresticker (Accellera)
n[.x-----------] Dennis Brophy (Mentor Graphics)
v[xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Eduard Cerny (Synopsys)
v[xx-xx-xxxxxxx] Ben Cohen (Accellera)
t[x-xxxxxx-xxxx] Dmitry Korchemny (Synopsys - Chair)
n[xxx-x-x------] Manisha Kulshrestha (Mentor Graphics)
v[xxxxxxxx-xx-x] Anupam Prabhakar (Mentor Graphics)
v[xxxxxxxxxxxx-] Erik Seligman (Intel – Co-chair)
v[x-x-xxxx-xx-x] Samik Sengupta (Synopsys)
|- attendance on 2016-09-21
|--- voting eligibility on 2016-09-21
Minutes
IEEE patent policy reminder
Minutes approval
Erik: Move to approve the minutes from 7-Sep-2016.
Ed: Second.
Motion passed: 5y/0n/0a.
Email ballot results
Issue 2947 – Passed (no change required).
Issue 3610 – Passed, but there was a change made in the middle of the ballot.
Issue 4724 – Passed
Ben: Move to approve 3610.
Ed: Second
Motion passed: 5y/0n/0a.
Mantis items in progress
2842: Randomization of free variables in deferred assertions
Anupam: Natural randomization points are the points of change of free variables
Dmitry: If so, if an assumption contains only free variables, its variables will never be randomized.
Ed: Agree with Dmitry.
Anupam: How is it different from concurrent assertions at the initialization?
Ed: Maybe to require a global clocking in this case?
Anupam: Items 2555 and 3614 are ready to vote.