TWiki
>
P1076 Web
>
Vhdl2019MeetingMinutes
>
2013_MeetingJune13
(2020-02-17,
JimLewis
)
E
dit
A
ttach
P1076 June 13, 2013 Meeting Minutes
Attendees:
JimLewis
*
PeterFlake
*
CliffordWalinsky
*
JarekKaczynski
Agenda:
Review VHDL-2008-MP remaining list items
Review VHDL-2008-TBV 6, 9, and 13
Check closure on AI from review lists.
See these items in the
collected requirements list
Review of VHDL-2008-MP
MP6: Allow attribute declarations in code regions (not just declaration regions)
Benefit: keeps attributes which control synthesis local with the code they modify
No compelling discussion either way.
Not for this revision
MP8 - Make transport the default delay mode
Breaks backward compatibility
not a high list
Concern about breaking backward compatibility
Not for this revision
MP - Allow subprogram bodies in package declarations
Benefit: removes extra declartion of package interface
May cause issues with encryption?
May complicate analysis process.
Jim thinks current requirements make big packages more readable.
Not for this revision
MP - Ability to apply register kind semantics to std_logic. Retain last resolved value when all drivers are off
Not clear what this is trying to get at.
Drop.
MP - Remove white space requirement in physical literals
Confusing for those who work in mixed language environments.
Do common simulators allow dropping of the space?
SystemVerilog
requires no space with their physical literals.
A small issue, not necessarily worth doing.
Revisit in next meeting.
MP - Short alias name for std_logic_vector
Short names increase likelyhood of finding other items also.
Complicates global search and replace
Concerns about conflicting with user names
Drop
MP - Value folding of std_ulogic (2 state/4 state)
Not clear
Discussion is tending toward multiple packages.
Need a more firm understanding of what is wanted and rationale.
Drop
MP - Implicit generic/port map in component instance
have proposal for
Implicit Parameter and Port Connections
Already have a proposal.
MP - Add Endif (like elsif)
If we add
EndIF
, then do we need
EndProcess
,
EndArchitecture
Drop.
MP - One_hot assertion to remove priority from if-then-elsif
Would be a package based
Accept. Need proposal
Make name consistent with PSL, and
SystemVerilog
(if possible).
MP - Longest static prefix issue with loops
Is this solvable?
Good thing about current situation:
Expensive to assign to elements of an array in a loop.
Preferred method: use temporary variable array, fill it up, and assign it to a signal.
AI: Cliff to look into this.
Revisit in next meeting.
Review and Approve Meeting Minutes:
Motion: Jerry 2nd: Peter
Next Meeting Date:
Thursday June 27, 8 am Pacific
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
R
aw View
|
Ra
w
edit
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r3 - 2020-02-17 - 15:36:12 -
JimLewis
P1076
Log In
or
Register
P1076 Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
Main
P1076
Ballots
LCS2016_080
P10761
P1647
P16661
P1685
P1734
P1735
P1778
P1800
P1801
Sandbox
TWiki
VIP
VerilogAMS
Copyright © 2008-2024 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback